
If you don’t smile at this, you have no heart

That is not funny
That is not cute
It is animal abuse
BIRDS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO EAT CHOCOLATE
BIRDS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE COATED IN CHOCOLATE
Why the fuck do you think birds who get coated in oil die? It’s for the same goddamn reason.
You idiots can have all the chuckles you want over the fact that that poor animal is “living the dream” but I hope you also know that it probably died from that.
And if you still find it funny then I genuinely do not want to associate with you and can only wish upon you the most the most painful and awful death imaginable.if you want to feel really sad about life, check out the comments on this bc 75% dont even get the joke and take it super seriously with “omg its a cartoooooon! why are you so mad???”
which in return is amazing bc the original post that is parodied here had that exact problem of not understanding context. its almost funny how ppl will always refuse to look up things they dont understand and jump to cobclusions instead. almost.
Its silly because I didn’t get the joke at first either but I still understood that the op wasn’t serious and some of these comments are legit offended by this and its just ???

That is not funny
That is not cute
It is animal abuse
BIRDS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO EAT CHOCOLATE
BIRDS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE COATED IN CHOCOLATE
Why the fuck do you think birds who get coated in oil die? It’s for the same goddamn reason.
You idiots can have all the chuckles you want over the fact that that poor animal is “living the dream” but I hope you also know that it probably died from that.
And if you still find it funny then I genuinely do not want to associate with you and can only wish upon you the most the most painful and awful death imaginable.if you want to feel really sad about life, check out the comments on this bc 75% dont even get the joke and take it super seriously with “omg its a cartoooooon! why are you so mad???”
which in return is amazing bc the original post that is parodied here had that exact problem of not understanding context. its almost funny how ppl will always refuse to look up things they dont understand and jump to cobclusions instead. almost.
Its silly because I didn’t get the joke at first either but I still understood that the op wasn’t serious and some of these comments are legit offended by this and its just ???

Shortly before starting the illustrations, Sendak realized he did not know how to draw horses and, at the suggestion of his editor, changed the wild horses to the more ambiguous “Wild Things”, a term inspired by the Yiddish expression “vilde chaya” (“wild animals”), used to indicate boisterous children. [x]
He once said: “At first the book was to be called Where the Wild Horses Are, but when it became apparent to my editor I could not draw horses, she kindly changed the title to ‘Wild Things,’ with the idea that I could at the very least draw ‘a thing’! [x]
(Fact Source) For more facts, follow Ultrafacts

Shortly before starting the illustrations, Sendak realized he did not know how to draw horses and, at the suggestion of his editor, changed the wild horses to the more ambiguous “Wild Things”, a term inspired by the Yiddish expression “vilde chaya” (“wild animals”), used to indicate boisterous children. [x]
He once said: “At first the book was to be called Where the Wild Horses Are, but when it became apparent to my editor I could not draw horses, she kindly changed the title to ‘Wild Things,’ with the idea that I could at the very least draw ‘a thing’! [x]
(Fact Source) For more facts, follow Ultrafacts